Balanced Parentheses (Generative)
Given $n$ pairs of parentheses, write a function to generate all combinations of well-formed parentheses. Use a Backtracking approach and track the counts of open and close brackets.
Why Interviewers Ask This
Google interviewers use this problem to evaluate a candidate's mastery of recursion, backtracking logic, and constraint management. It tests the ability to visualize state transitions (open vs. close counts) without relying on brute force. Specifically, they assess whether you can prune invalid branches early to optimize time complexity, a critical skill for building scalable systems.
How to Answer This Question
1. Clarify Constraints: Immediately define input limits and edge cases like n=0 or n=1. State that we need all valid permutations, not just one.
2. Define the State: Explain that your recursive function needs three parameters: current string builder, count of open brackets used, and count of close brackets used.
3. Establish Base Case: Describe stopping when the string length equals 2*n, indicating a complete valid combination.
4. Formulate Recursive Logic: Detail the two rules: add an open bracket if open_count < n, and add a close bracket only if close_count < open_count. Emphasize that this second rule prevents malformed strings.
5. Optimize & Discuss Complexity: Mention using a StringBuilder or char array for O(1) append operations rather than string concatenation. Conclude by analyzing Time Complexity as O(4^n / sqrt(n)) and Space Complexity as O(n) for the recursion stack.
Key Points to Cover
- Explicitly defining the pruning condition where close_count must be less than open_count
- Demonstrating understanding of Time Complexity relative to Catalan numbers
- Using mutable data structures like StringBuilder to avoid unnecessary object creation
- Clearly articulating the base case and termination conditions of the recursion
- Handling edge cases such as n=0 or negative inputs gracefully
Sample Answer
To solve the balanced parentheses problem efficiently, I would use a backtracking approach with a recursive helper function. The core idea is to build the solution character by character while maintaining strict constraints on the number of open and close brackets available.
First, I initialize a list to store results and start the recursion with an empty string, zero open brackets, and zero close brackets. The base case occurs when the current string reaches a length of 2*n; at this point, we have a valid combination and add it to our result set.
For the recursive step, there are two conditional branches. First, if the count of open brackets used is less than n, we can safely append an opening parenthesis '(' and recurse. This ensures we don't exceed the total pairs allowed. Second, and more critically, we can only append a closing parenthesis ')' if the count of close brackets is strictly less than the count of open brackets. This condition guarantees that every closing bracket has a matching preceding open bracket, preventing invalid sequences like ')('.
I would implement this using a StringBuilder to ensure efficient memory usage during string construction. Regarding complexity, while the output size is exponential, the pruning logic ensures we never explore invalid paths. This approach aligns well with Google's focus on algorithmic efficiency and clean, logical code structure in their engineering roles.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Attempting to generate all 2^(2n) combinations first and then filtering them, which causes TLE due to lack of pruning
- Failing to check if close_count is less than open_count before adding a closing bracket, leading to invalid outputs
- Using string concatenation inside the recursive loop instead of a StringBuilder, resulting in poor performance
- Neglecting to pass state variables correctly between recursive calls, causing infinite loops or incorrect counts
Practice This Question with AI
Answer this question orally or via text and get instant AI-powered feedback on your response quality, structure, and delivery.
Related Interview Questions
Find K Closest Elements (Heaps)
Medium
MetaEvaluate Reverse Polish Notation (Stack)
Medium
SpotifyConvert Binary Tree to Doubly Linked List in Place
Hard
MicrosoftDesign a Set with $O(1)$ `insert`, `remove`, and `check`
Easy
CiscoDefining Your Own Success Metrics
Medium
GoogleProduct Strategy: Addressing Market Saturation
Medium
Google