Maximum Frequency Stack

Data Structures
Hard
Salesforce
21.3K views

Design a stack-like data structure that supports pushing an element and popping the most frequent element. If there's a tie in frequency, pop the element closest to the top of the stack.

Why Interviewers Ask This

Salesforce asks this to evaluate your ability to balance time complexity against space complexity while managing multiple constraints. They specifically test if you can design a system that handles dynamic frequency updates and tie-breaking logic efficiently, mirroring real-world scenarios where data access patterns shift rapidly.

How to Answer This Question

1. Clarify requirements: Confirm the tie-breaking rule (LIFO for same frequency) and input types. 2. Propose a brute-force solution first to establish a baseline, then immediately pivot to an optimized approach using hash maps and stacks. 3. Detail your data structures: Use a frequency map to track counts, a max-heap or bucket-based structure to group elements by frequency, and individual stacks within those buckets to preserve insertion order. 4. Walk through operations: Explain how push updates frequency and moves elements between buckets in O(1), and how pop retrieves from the highest non-empty bucket. 5. Analyze complexity: Explicitly state O(1) time for both operations and discuss space trade-offs. This structured flow demonstrates the systematic problem-solving Salesforce values.

Key Points to Cover

  • Explicitly defining the LIFO tie-breaking condition before coding
  • Using a bucket-based approach (stacks grouped by frequency) rather than a heap
  • Demonstrating O(1) time complexity for both push and pop operations
  • Correctly managing the state of the maximum frequency variable during pops
  • Explaining the trade-off between extra space usage and speed optimization

Sample Answer

To solve the Maximum Frequency Stack, I would first clarify that when frequencies are tied, we must pop the element most recently pushed. A naive approach of scanning the stack every time would be O(N) per operation, which is inefficient. Instead, I propose an O(1) solution using three key components: a frequency map, a max-frequency tracker, and a collection of stacks indexed by frequency. We maintain a hash map called 'freq' to store the current count of each number. We also use another map called 'group', where the key is the frequency and the value is a stack of numbers having that specific frequency. When pushing a number, we increment its frequency in 'freq'. If this new frequency exceeds our current maximum, we update the max. Then, we push the number onto the stack corresponding to its new frequency in 'group'. For popping, we look at the 'group' stack associated with the current maximum frequency. The top of this stack is our answer because it represents the most frequent element added last among those with that frequency. After retrieving it, we decrement its frequency in 'freq' and remove it from the stack. If that frequency stack becomes empty, we decrement the global maximum frequency. This ensures both push and pop operations remain constant time, handling the dynamic nature of data access patterns effectively.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Using a simple priority queue without considering the LIFO requirement for ties, leading to incorrect output
  • Failing to handle the case where the max frequency stack becomes empty after a pop
  • Implementing a solution that requires scanning the entire stack to find the most frequent element
  • Overlooking edge cases like empty inputs or single-element stacks during the explanation phase

Practice This Question with AI

Answer this question orally or via text and get instant AI-powered feedback on your response quality, structure, and delivery.

Start Practicing

Related Interview Questions

Browse all 154 Data Structures questionsBrowse all 49 Salesforce questions