Lowest Common Ancestor of a Binary Tree
Given a binary tree and two nodes $p$ and $q$, find the Lowest Common Ancestor (LCA) of the two nodes.
Why Interviewers Ask This
Apple interviewers ask this to evaluate your ability to traverse tree structures recursively and handle edge cases without relying on built-in libraries. They specifically test your understanding of parent-child relationships, base case identification, and the logic required to backtrack up a call stack. This problem reveals whether you can design an optimal O(n) solution while maintaining code clarity under pressure.
How to Answer This Question
1. Clarify constraints immediately: Ask if the tree is a Binary Search Tree (BST) or a general binary tree, as this changes the approach significantly. Apple values precise communication.
2. Define the recursive strategy: Explain that for a general tree, you search left and right subtrees. If both return non-null, the current node is the LCA. If one returns null, propagate the non-null result up.
3. Walk through a concrete example: Use a small tree with nodes 3, 5, 1, 6, 2, 0, 8. Trace how the function finds p=5 and q=1 by returning 5 from the left and 1 from the right at root 3.
4. Discuss complexity: Explicitly state time complexity is O(n) because every node is visited once, and space complexity is O(h) for the recursion stack, where h is height.
5. Handle edge cases: Mention scenarios where p or q are not in the tree, or if one node is the ancestor of the other, ensuring your logic covers these gracefully.
Key Points to Cover
- Demonstrate clear distinction between BST and general binary tree approaches
- Explain the recursive backtracking logic where non-null results from both sides identify the LCA
- Analyze time complexity as O(n) and space complexity as O(h) explicitly
- Provide a concrete trace using specific node values to validate the logic
- Address edge cases like one node being the ancestor of the other
Sample Answer
To solve the Lowest Common Ancestor problem for a general binary tree, I would use a post-order traversal approach via recursion. First, I'd clarify if this is a BST or a standard binary tree; assuming it's a standard tree, we cannot rely on value ordering. The core logic involves checking three conditions at each node: if the current node matches p or q, we return it. Then, we recursively search the left and right subtrees. If both recursive calls return non-null values, it means p and q are found in different subtrees, making the current node the lowest common ancestor. If only one side returns a non-null value, that value propagates up, indicating both nodes lie in that subtree. For example, in a tree rooted at 3 with children 5 and 1, searching for 5 and 1 would find 5 in the left branch and 1 in the right. Since both branches return valid nodes, 3 is identified as the LCA. This approach ensures we visit each node exactly once, resulting in O(n) time complexity. Space complexity depends on the tree height, O(h), due to the recursion stack. I would also add a check to ensure p and q actually exist in the tree if the problem statement implies they might be missing, though typically LeetCode-style questions guarantee existence. This method is efficient, readable, and handles all structural variations of binary trees effectively.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Confusing the general binary tree approach with the simpler BST value-comparison method
- Failing to handle the case where one target node is the ancestor of the other
- Ignoring base cases, leading to infinite recursion or null pointer exceptions
- Not discussing why the current node is the answer when both recursive calls return non-null
Practice This Question with AI
Answer this question orally or via text and get instant AI-powered feedback on your response quality, structure, and delivery.
Related Interview Questions
Find K Closest Elements (Heaps)
Medium
MetaEvaluate Reverse Polish Notation (Stack)
Medium
SpotifyConvert Binary Tree to Doubly Linked List in Place
Hard
MicrosoftDesign a Set with $O(1)$ `insert`, `remove`, and `check`
Easy
CiscoDiscuss Serverless Functions vs. Containers (FaaS vs. CaaS)
Easy
AppleGame of Life
Medium
Apple